Executive Viewpoint: Tom Ashoff, Sourcefire
Executive Viewpoint: Tom Ashoff, Sourcefire
By Tom Ashoff
published: Tuesday, December 23 2008


Executive Viewpoint: Predicting the Future - FEATURING: Tom Ashoff

2009 will be a year for virtual security.

2007 was a breakout year for virtualization, where companies discovered the economic and organizational benefits in building out a virtual infrastructure. According to a survey conducted by Symantec in late 2007, 90 percent of the survey respondents have implemented or are considering virtualization for their data centers, and 50 percent have actually implemented it. Virtualization projects range from server consolidation and disaster recovery to the simplification of provisioning for desktops and associated applications.

 

2008 has been a year where organizations are digesting their purchases of virtualization products and are only now starting to realize the management challenges virtualization provides. Only a relatively small number of respondents to an Enterprise Management Associates survey published last April thought that virtualization made management tasks more difficult. According to the author of the survey, however, it is likely that the respondents underestimate the difficulties and are likely to change their response in the next year or so. Everything from performance and capacity management to troubleshooting and security administration becomes more difficult in a volatile, multilayered and often heterogeneous virtualized environment.

 

In the midst of dealing with the complexity of managing virtual networks, organizations have not paid sufficient attention to security. According to Stephen Elliott, IDC's research director for enterprise systems management software, "We're finding security is the forgotten stepchild in the virtualization build-out. That's scary when you think about the number of production-level VMs." IDC research indicates that 75 percent of companies with 1,000 or more employees are employing virtualization today.

 

Historically, the security market has been driven by the occurrence of well-publicized attacks or incidents, such as various computer worms (Slammer, Storm, Nimda, etc.), the theft of consumer credit card data from Hannaford, or the theft of a Veterans Administration laptop containing personal data for millions of veterans. This negative publicity created a greater sense of security awareness, which in turn led to more stringent regulatory requirements for security.

 

Because of the lack of attention paid to securing virtual networks, there is a distinct possibility that the first public security breach related to virtualization policies or technologies will take place in 2009, which will lead to even more scrutiny of security in virtualized environments. As a result, in 2009, security will take center stage with security professionals playing a larger role in auditing their virtual environments and making the necessary architectural and policy changes.

 

Compliance will also play a much larger role for virtualization in 2009. Until now, auditors have not played a large role in inspecting virtual networks to ensure they meet regulatory requirements. The Payment Card Industry's Data Security Standard (PCI-DSS) was recently updated on October 1, 2008, from version 1.1 to 1.2 and includes no provisions to secure data in virtualized environments. However, as virtualization becomes more prominent and auditors become more familiar with this technology, this will change. At some point we can expect that virtualization will explicitly be mentioned in standards such as PCI-DSS and organizations will either have to make changes to meet compliance requirements, or determine how to satisfy requirements with the architectures they have selected.

 

For example, one key area where virtualization may affect PCI-DSS is network segmentation. The current PCI standard encourages companies to isolate their payment systems in a separate, secure network to decrease their exposure. Unfortunately, it is not clear whether two virtual machines (VMs) in the same physical host can be considered to be properly segmented. Therefore, defining and enforcing true segmentation between VMs will be an important topic in 2009. This discussion may strengthen the business case for virtual firewalls and intrusion prevention systems (IPSes) because these devices can more effectively enforce segmentation between VMs.

 

As virtualization begins to reach maturity within the enterprise, organizations will have to address a bevy of security-related issues. In order to effectively protect their environments from the threats VMs are subject to, organizations must view security as a process, not a technology or product. With this in mind, a number of best practices can help mitigate the security risks that may be created when an enterprise implements virtualization:

 

  1. Apply standard security practices to VMs as if they were physical.  These include antivirus and antispyware agents, configuration control, and vulnerability scanning.
  2. Segment VMs by the data they contain. Do not combine VMs containing sensitive data with VMs designated for QA or testing, for example.
  3. Enforce isolation between network segments. Do not combine VMs in the same host if they are connected to network segments at different trust levels. 
  4. Guard against VM sprawl by maintaining an inventory of VMs and the physical host they reside on.  All migrations should be documented and subject to a configuration control approval process.

 

It is likely that regulatory pressure will begin to emerge and that auditors at some point in the not too distant future will require organizations to address the potential risks caused by virtualization. In the midst of this environment, IT security professionals need to support best practices with tools that can help them do their jobs effectively. They need visibility into their virtual infrastructure, tracking where VMs reside, where they move to, and what other hosts they are communicating with. They also need a means of applying the proper security processes to their VMs, providing the same level of security to their virtual infrastructure that they do to their physical infrastructure.

 

If we are to truly benefit from the promises of virtualization, security must come to the forefront in 2009. Best practices and tools that offer a holistic approach for managing both physical and virtual network security are the answer. With this in mind perhaps industry can finally break the cycle of having a major and quite public security breach open our eyes to the need for security in the virtual environment.

 


Related Links:

Sourcefire

All Executive Viewpoint Article

 

 

Tom AshoffTom Ashoff joined Sourcefire in April of 2003 as Vice President of Engineering. Tom is responsible for the company's engineering infrastructure and processes as well as executing Sourcefire's aggressive product development roadmap.

Prior to joining Sourcefire, Tom was Vice President, Strategic Product Engineering at Network Associates Laboratories, Network Associates' (McAfee) Technology Research Division, where he directed strategic research efforts for the company.  Earlier in his tenure at Network Associates, Tom was the Vice President of Engineering for PGP Security, a business unit of Network Associates.  Tom joined Network Associates through the acquisition of Trusted Information Systems (TIS) in 1998. At TIS, Tom was the Senior Development Manager for the Gauntlet Firewall and VPN products. Prior to TIS, Tom developed software for GTE Spacenet, Contel ASC, HRB Singer, and the National Security Agency.

Tom holds a B.S. in Computer Science from the University of Pittsburgh.

 

 

Comments
Search RSS
Please register as a member of Virtual Strategy Magazine to comment.Click here to register.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."