Abstract - Microsoft & Google: Cloud Computing Dominance Through Renewable Energy By Steve Denegri published: Thursday, October 30 2008
This report reflects the opinions of the author and not necessarily
those of Virtual Strategy Magazine. All rights reserved.
In the
realm of enterprise computing today, vendors and pundits alike invoke the
inevitability of the "green" data center. Users who just last decade
anticipated years of exponential growth in features such as bandwidth,
performance, or capacity are suddenly realizing that insufficient supply of electricity
and its skyrocketing cost severely threaten the pace of innovation. The
prevailing remedy centers on strategies to reduce data center energy
consumption.
However,
this mindset is nothing more than groupthink gone awry. A closer look
will reveal that users' prevailing need to conserve energy in the data center is
actually the foundation for a momentous inflection point in data center
computing, whereby the most recognized vendors in computing can build their own
data centers and sell IT services at prices far below what it costs most
organizations to support, themselves. Microsoft and Google, in
particular, are leveraging the energy conundrum in such a way as to bolster
their own individual data center strategies, and they are using their enormous
leverage to create formidable barriers to entry that will increasingly make the
"build versus buy" decision an easy one.
The
aforementioned barriers are allowing Microsoft and Google to establish data
center cost structures that are so low that they could potentially eliminate
competition. Examples include multi-year abatements on property taxes for
mega-sized facilities, permanent absolution from sales taxes on new equipment
within these data centers, and, most importantly, power purchase agreements
(PPAs) from suppliers of emission-free renewable energy that guarantee
multi-year power supply at a fixed cost per kilowatt-hour (kwh).
Furthermore, Microsoft has said publicly that it is authoring software in
collaboration with the largest municipalities across the globe that will help
each city monitor its carbon emissions, giving each the ability to implement a
tax system based upon environmental sustainability. Since those data centers that are not powered
by renewable sources are among the biggest emitters of CO2, such
taxes will further elevate the cost of running a data center. If they are
powered by renewable energy, the data centers being built by Microsoft and
Google would benefit, enormously, because they would avoid such sustainability
taxation.
The end
goal that Microsoft and Google are aiming to achieve seems to be to "get off
the grid," meaning that they desire for their data centers to have their own
dedicated supply of energy rather than connect to the public power grid. In
fact, this report hypothesizes that data center computing is likely to become controlled
at the local level, whereby data services become another product offered by the
local power company. Indeed, municipalities
are actually welcoming the construction of mega-sized data centers from these
two vendors, despite the fact that they absorb a massive amount of resources
and on the surface, appear to contribute very little to local economies. Furthermore, recent presentations by
Microsoft reveal that it now charges for data center services on a per-watt
basis, since its internal cost analyses demonstrate that growth scales most
closely to power consumed. Therefore, municipalities are likely
salivating at the thought of owning and incorporating compute utilities into
their city's budget structures, since such facilities have the potential to
contribute hundreds of millions of dollars to the municipal coffers each
year.
While
Microsoft is concentrating its data center strategy upon larger cities, Google
is targeting in smaller towns. In fact, given the exorbitant amount of
acreage that Google purchases, far beyond its data center need, it is apparent
that it plans to use this excess space to generate its own renewable energy supply
to power its compute infrastructure. Combined, the two companies appear
to be on a mission to leverage their size and influence to become the lowest
cost suppliers of data services to commercial businesses, with specific plans
still having not been revealed to the public. For those readers who rely upon
their corporate data center, listen up: your world is about to change.
Re-printing/re-posting of this content is prohibited. Copyright ©
2008 Virtual Strategy Magazine
Related Links:
Is Power The Key To Controlling The Cloud?, Microsoft and Google Controlling Cloud Computing Through Power?, Is Hyper-V Nothing More Than A Distraction?
|