View From the Floor: Ten Signatures By Eric Hanselman published: Friday, September 04 2009
Leostream's Eric Hanselman blogs from VMworld 2009.
If you’ve
spent much time reading or talking to information technology analysts,
you’ve probably heard about the Gartner Hype Cycle. The general
idea, for those few that have managed to avoid it, is that new technologies go
through a progression of perceptions. After starting with optimistic
views of new technology, crashing through disillusionment, we eventually wind
up at reality. Paul Martiz’s opening address pointed out just how
far this irrational exuberance has gone.
He talked about
a conversation with customers who were frustrated with having to get ten
signatures to provision a machine. They knew that the cloud would fix
this for them. They didn’t know how, but they knew it would
happen. Is this the audacity of hope about the cloud? Does it
translate more broadly with virtualization? Is this a shared
delusion? Paul accurately described this as a mythical quality of the
cloud.
The ten
signatures are a result of an enterprise process. However extreme this
example may be, if we’re going to minimize the depth of the trough of
disillusionment, we have to acknowledge that there is a transition that has to
be made from our existing operational models. Virtualization won’t
fix this. There is huge potential to make our operational lives
simpler. We need to be realistic about what can be changed without
breaking some safeguards that need to exist.
Most large
enterprises have processes for change management. Paul’s comments
are apt to strike fear into the hearts of audit and compliance teams because of
the implication that deploying from templates would be enough to satisfy this
process. Steve Herrod reiterated this today with his happy splash of
“Signature Avoidance” in his presentation. This approach
seems to be missing a fundamental point or two about how a production
application actually gets to production. If there were automated tools to
really validate what someone is about to do, we might be close to a signature-free
life, but I haven’t seen a tool that can tell the future, yet."
To get to a
brave new future, we have to transition. We can’t just jump.
Paul is right that we need to start wrapping bubbles around pieces to deliver
gradual change. We need to approach deployment and change processes with
an eye to how we can reduce steps by taking advantage of virtual world
advantages. We have to seize the improvements in agility that they
provide. We need to do it in a way that maintains the reliability and
availability that we’ve worked so hard to achieve.
We need to look
before we leap.
|